| Summary: | virt-who ignores -c option | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Peter Tselios <tselios.petros> |
| Component: | virt-who | Assignee: | Chris Snyder <csnyder> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Eko <hsun> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.4 | CC: | bbuckingham, csnyder, hsun, jcallaha, ktordeur, sgao, tomckay, yuefliu |
| Target Milestone: | pre-dev-freeze | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-06-05 08:08:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Peter Tselios
2016-11-04 11:15:43 UTC
now virt-who will run all the configure files in /etc/virt-who.d/ by default, if the file is in /etc/virt-who.d/, with -c or without -c, this file will always be run, the -c option often be used for the files not in /etc/virt-who.d/, Hi Chris, do you think this is a bug? Considering this worked differently in prior versions of virt-who, I would say that this is a bug. The current behaviour seems to be to add the configuration specified using -c but not to limit the configs used to only those specified using the cli options. Is the desired behaviour to ignore all configuration in the /etc/virt-who.d directory if given at least one -c option? Hello, Even if -c was designed to use files outside of /etc/virt-who.d, it's not documented. And in any case, we need to have a way to run virt-who for only one configuration file. It's not a option to remove unwanted files from /etc/virt-who.d, run the command and then place the rest of the files back in /etc/virt-who.d. It still exist on virt-who-0.21.0-1.el7.noarch I would say this looks like a duplicate of [0] which has a better status report [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542652 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1542652 *** |