| Summary: | [DOCS] Verifying Installation missing webui information | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Sean V. Thompson <seant> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | brice <bfallonf> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Sean V. Thompson <seant> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, mmccomas, seant |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-22 01:00:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Sean V. Thompson
2016-11-06 04:26:53 UTC
Sean, I'm not getting the same results from the commands you mention above. However, I can see the merits of having verification steps in there. I know that if you append the hostname with a :8443 in a browser you can test out to console. Would you be happy with that being the verification step indeed? Is there anything else that is required if that's the direction we go in? Thanks! 1. "I'm not getting the same results from the commands you mention above." I ran that command on my master node (single master, multi node setup). If you got "oc get nodes" (already in the doc) to work then "oc get endpoints" should work. 2. "I know that if you append the hostname with a :8443 in a browser you can test out to console. Would you be happy with that being the verification step indeed?" I would. Running "oc get nodes" is already part of the verification. I think accessing the console would be recommended. 3. "Is there anything else that is required if that's the direction we go in?" I think whatever is customary in other documents is fine. Personally, I think it would be nice to reference a troubleshooting section. e.g., "'oc get nodes' doesn't show ready, Now what?" or "Tried accessing the console and failed. Now what?" However, it may not be feasible to create a list. Further clarification on #2. By default :8443 should work. but it is configurable and someone may have changed it during the installation process. I would clarify that. If doing the advanced ansible install. There is a variable set in the /etc/ansible/hosts file that clarifies :XXXX. the variable is openshift_master_console_port=8443. Further clarification on #2. By default :8443 should work. but it is configurable and someone may have changed it during the installation process. I would clarify that. If doing the advanced ansible install. There is a variable set in the /etc/ansible/hosts file that clarifies :XXXX. the variable is openshift_master_console_port=8443. OK. I submitted a PR for this: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/3189 Sean, I won't ask for review as this is pretty straight-forward, but if you have any comments please let me know! Thanks! Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/f1d8709dad8c46a10f4b34e529f6793ca89c25c5 Merge pull request #3189 from bfallonf/verify_1392204 Bug 1392204 added verification steps for console |