Bug 1392210

Summary: [aarch64]rpm install error for coreutils-common
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tommy He <lovenemesis>
Component: coreutilsAssignee: Kamil Dudka <kdudka>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 25CC: admiller, jamartis, kdudka, kzak, lovenemesis, ooprala, ovasik, p, pstodulk, twaugh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: aarch64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-09 09:32:56 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
dnf error output none

Description Tommy He 2016-11-06 09:10:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1217705 [details]
dnf error output

Description of problem:

Unable to dnf update coreutils-common

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

8.25-15.fc25

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to upgrade coreutils-common by dnf
2.
3.

Actual results:

Error while installing

Expected results:

Install without error

Additional info:

See attachment
Comment 1 Kamil Dudka 2016-11-06 09:56:36 UTC 
Where did you download the package from?

Try to install it directly from Koji:

# dnf install http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/kojifiles/packages/coreutils/8.25/15.fc25/aarch64/coreutils-common-8.25-15.fc25.aarch64.rpm
Comment 2 Tommy He 2016-11-09 04:37:57 UTC 
Tried the above command, problem remains in the exactly same way.

The package was from standard Repo.

A bit more information on the test bed:

I was following this [tutorial](https://nmilosev.svbtle.com/termuxfedora-install-fedora-on-your-phone-with-termux) to get Fedora 25 aarch64 on my Android tablet.
Comment 3 Kamil Dudka 2016-11-09 09:32:56 UTC 
Let me close this as duplicate of bug #1392208 so that we keep the information at a single place.  This does not seem to be a problem with the particular packages built for aarch64.  It seems to be a problem with the system where the packages are being installed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1392208 ***