| Summary: | Inadequate summary | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | dotNET | Reporter: | Debarshi Ray <debarshir> |
| Component: | rh-dotnetcore10 | Assignee: | Omair Majid <omajid> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | jiri vanek <jvanek> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Les Williams <lwilliam> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2.2 | CC: | bgollahe, dbhole, hhorak, jorton, kanderso, lzachar |
| Target Milestone: | ga | ||
| Target Release: | 1.1 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-25 19:18:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Debarshi Ray
2016-11-07 16:40:02 UTC
(Adding some RHSCL folks to CC for advice) I followed the general guide for SCL packages: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/docs/guide/#sect-Meta_Package If this is a bug, it should be fixed more systematically. It affects many other packages too. Just off the top of my head: # yum info rh-python34{,-runtime} rh-python35{,-runtime} rh-ror41{,-runtime} rh-ror42{,-runtime} rh-ruby22{,-runtime} rh-ruby23{,-runtime} | grep Summary Summary : Package that installs rh-python34 Summary : Package that handles rh-python34 Software Collection. Summary : Package that installs rh-python35 Summary : Package that handles rh-python35 Software Collection. Summary : Package that installs rh-ror41 Summary : Package that handles rh-ror41 Software Collection. Summary : Package that installs rh-ror42 Summary : Package that handles rh-ror42 Software Collection. Summary : Package that installs rh-ruby22 Summary : Package that handles rh-ruby22 Software Collection. Summary : Package that installs rh-ruby23 Summary : Package that handles rh-ruby23 Software Collection. Would something like ".NET Core 1.0 software collection" and "Runtime bits for .NET Core 1.0 software collection" help? (In reply to Omair Majid from comment #1) > Would something like ".NET Core 1.0 software collection" and "Runtime bits > for .NET Core 1.0 software collection" help? I guess, it would. I don't have a strong opinion on the exact string, though. I was just playing with a free RHEL developer image and the subscriptions that come with it, when I noticed this. Closing as WONTFIX, since this is pretty much how all SCL packages look by design. |