Bug 1392655
| Summary: | tenant quota can be exceeded by a single VM (if it fits partially in the remaining quota) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Reartes Guillermo <greartes> | ||||||||||||||||
| Component: | Provisioning | Assignee: | Tina Fitzgerald <tfitzger> | ||||||||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Pavol Kotvan <pakotvan> | ||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||||||||||||
| Version: | 5.7.0 | CC: | dajohnso, greartes, jhardy, obarenbo, pakotvan | ||||||||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||||||||||||||||||
| Target Release: | cfme-future | ||||||||||||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | tenant:quota:provision | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-04 13:50:11 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Hi Guillermo, I'm having trouble reproducing this issue. Could you setup an environment where I can see the issue? Thanks, Tina Hi,
I updated my test environment to CF 4.2 some time ago. (CF + RHV + aTWR + Sat6).
I will re-test with 4.2. (I do not remember having re-tested with 4.2).
I might be able to setup a 4.1 environment again, but it will take time.
I originally found this on customer environment (on 4.1), but the customer refused to open a support case, so i later reproduced in my test environment and then opened this bz.
> I'm having trouble reproducing this issue.
> Could you setup an environment where I can see the issue?
Are you using 5.6.x or 5.7.x (or other version)?
After i re-test with 4.2 (5.7.x) i will clear the needinfo flag.
Cheers.
I've been testing on 5.8, but the quota code hasn't changed in a while. Testing on 4.2 would be great, thanks. Hi, I re-tested with CF 4.2 and reproduced it. I did change the version to 5.7.x. I will upload some files in a momment. Created attachment 1271477 [details]
screenshot #1, first VM (OK)
Created attachment 1271478 [details]
second VM (ok)
Created attachment 1271479 [details]
VM #3, it surpassed CPU quota
Created attachment 1271480 [details]
support data (DC-MAIN)
Created attachment 1271481 [details]
support data (DC-RHV-Worker-1)
Created attachment 1271482 [details]
VM #4. denied due to quota (OK)
Hi, I finished uploading files. CFME: 5.7.1.3 I provisioned the first 2 VMs under the quota limit. Then i provisioned the third one, while i should have been allowed to provision only a single-core vm, i provisioned a quad-core vm. After that, i tried a fourth and it was denied correctly. Cheers. Thanks for the new information. Can I access your appliance? Unfortunately i do not have vpn access. The test environment is in my home. The only thing that i can think off would be a bomgar session and a bj session. I am not sure if that would require a support case (that would not be a problem). Cheers. Hi Pavol, I've tested this issue on master and it's working properly. Could you try to reproduce the issue on 5.7? Thanks, Tina I tried provisioning a single VM with 4 cpu's with only 1 left in sub-tenant quota: [----] I, [2017-05-11T13:34:01.793339 #8435:3ffe84e413a4] INFO -- : Q-task_id([miq_provision_request_479]) <AutomationEngine> <AEMethod validate_quota> Quota maximum exceeded for key: cpu_quota_exceeded reason: cpu - Used: 5 plus requested: 4 exceeds quota: 6 Hi, I noticed this talk.manageiq.org thread: http://talk.manageiq.org/t/quotas-does-not-properly-checked-for-service-provision-and-not-multiplied-by-number-of-vms-for-vm-provisioning/2354 Cheers. Hi Pavol, I'm glad to hear that it's working properly on 5.7. Can we close this ticket? Thanks, Tina Hi Pavol, Can we close this ticket? Thanks, Tina |
Created attachment 1218331 [details] exceeded quota screenshot (the quota will be enforced from now on) CFME: 5.6.2.2 Description of problem: I have a tenant: DemoCorp. It has 2 child tenants: DC_Desarrollo, DC_Produccion Allocated Virtual CPUs : 3 Count Allocated Memory in GB : 2.0 GB Allocated Storage in GB : 50.0 GB Allocated Number of Virtual Machines : 3 The quotas are enforced, mostly. There is an issue with the last approved VM. If one has 1 cpu, one can use more than one cpu for the last approved VM. If one has 1 gb, one can consume more than that for the last approved VM. I did not test this with the other quota elements. Actual results: One has 1gb or 1cpu remaining in the child tenant quota and the service catalog's dialog has: * 1,2,4,8 cpus,etc -> the vm will be provisioned with all those values. * 1024,2048,8192,etc -> the vm will be provisioned with all those values. Expected results: the vm should ony be provisioned if 1 cpu was selected and 1024mb was selected. The column for tenant quota "available" will be negative. No further VMs will be provisioned, since the quota will be enforced. I did not try manual provisioning from life-cycle button. How reproducible: always