Bug 1392747

Summary: [RFE] Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output similar to 'Host' option of webUI
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: hprakash
Component: HammerAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.0CC: dhlavacd, inecas, mhulan, tstrachota
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-08 10:25:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description hprakash 2016-11-08 06:41:20 UTC
1. Proposed title of this feature request  
  Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output
  
2. Who is the customer behind the request?  
Acxiom c/o D&B 
  
TAM customer: no/yes  
SRM customer: no/yes  
Strategic: no/yes  
  
3. What is the nature and description of the request?  
  Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output similar to the json output of YAML tab(Host-->YAML) OR maybe an option to download the YAML output in a file.
4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)  
  
5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)  
  Customer needs an option with hammer CLI
6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.  
  The new hammer option should have the same output as of 'Host' in the webUI.
7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?  
  No
8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)?  
  No
9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?  
  
10. List any affected packages or components.  
  
11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?  
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 hprakash 2016-11-08 10:25:57 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1372731 ***