Bug 139319
Summary: | better labeling than just "DOS in grub installer.. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joel Juliano <joelbryanster> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | CC: | dag, nobody+pnasrat |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-15 15:36:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joel Juliano
2004-11-15 06:40:35 UTC
Not in a reliable fashion. And FC3 actually uses "Other" instead of "DOS" for these Would 'Windows' when NTFS or FAT32 is discovered not be a better choice ? Most people would expect proper naming when suddenly a bootmanager offers choice they previously did not have. We could assume that people installing Fedora Core or RHEL are doing it on a system that (still) runs Windows. I'd rather have my DOS entry called Windows then my Windows (and other entries) being called Other |