Bug 1393653

Summary:	[Async Doc] Multi-protocol access is not supported
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha>
Component:	doc-Administration_Guide	Assignee:	Laura Bailey <lbailey>
doc-Administration_Guide sub component:	3.1 Release	QA Contact:	storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	Docs Contact:
Severity:	unspecified
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	amukherj, asriram, asrivast, cblum, ffilz, jthottan, kkeithle, lbailey, nbalacha, ndevos, ppai, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sbhaloth, skoduri, storage-doc
Version:	rhgs-3.1	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	RHGS 3.1.3 Async
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-26 13:00:05 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nithya Balachandran 2016-11-10 05:46:44 UTC

Description of problem:
The RHGS Admin guide states that NFS and FUSE can be used together to access Gluster volumes. This is not supported and needs to be updated to reflect the same.


Section:
CHAPTER 7. Accessing Data - Setting Up Clients

Table 7.1. Cross Protocol Data Access Matrix


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


Document URL: 

Section Number and Name: 

Describe the issue: 

Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information:

Comment 29 surabhi 2016-12-05 06:39:33 UTC

Automated functional tests and basic sanity is been done where multiple operations(PUT, GET, DELETE,UPDATE) on objects are done and accessed via fuse client to verify the operation.
Simultaneous access from FUSE+OBJECT has not been exclusively tested for all scenarios.There might be issues in those areas which is not been tested by QE.

Comment 31 surabhi 2016-12-05 09:42:00 UTC

As I mentioned it is not exclusively qualified by QE so as per discussions in previous comments we may not mark this as compatible until it is fully qualified by QE.

Comment 36 Rahul Hinduja 2016-12-06 11:51:38 UTC

Based on comment 19,31 and 35 moving this bug to verified state.

Comment 37 Alok 2016-12-06 12:26:37 UTC

Instead of "Although a Red Hat Gluster Storage trusted pool can be configured to support multiple protocols simultaneously, a single volume cannot be freely accessed by different protocols due to differences in locking semantics. " Use this " A single RHGS volume cannot be concurrently accessed by FUSE, SMB and NFS. This is because of difference in locking symantics"

Comment 40 Rahul Hinduja 2016-12-07 08:43:55 UTC

Changes in comment 39 looks good to me. Moving this bug to verified state.