Bug 1394228

Summary: Clarify NFV / HA Solution Description
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Marko Myllynen <myllynen>
Component: documentationAssignee: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0 (Mitaka)CC: cfontain, djuran, lbopf, srevivo
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-25 14:58:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Marko Myllynen 2016-11-11 12:49:07 UTC 
Description of problem:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/9/single/red-hat-solution-for-network-functions-virtualization/ describes Red Hat Solution for NFV. Section 2.4. High Availability provides a brief introduction to HA and then 2.4.1. High Availability (keepalived) describes HA in a bit more detail from keepalived POV. 2.4.2. Instance High Availability (pacemaker remote) discusses Instance HA.

This makes it look like keepalived is the corner stone of OpenStack / NFV HA. But as we know that's not the whole story, for example, some components are HA without keepalived.

Please clarify the HA description in the RH NFV document to match what recent RH OSP are actually using for HA.
Comment 1 Christophe Fontaine 2018-07-25 14:58:29 UTC 
The current documentation (OSP13) should cover the requirements.