Bug 1394486

Summary: Inconsistent naming of errata applicable vs affected
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Peter Vreman <peter.vreman>
Component: Errata ManagementAssignee: Justin Sherrill <jsherril>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.2.3CC: bbuckingham, jcallaha, jsherril
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-02-21 16:41:34 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1122832    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Satellite 6.3 - content view version - errata none

Description Peter Vreman 2016-11-12 13:31:57 UTC 
Description of problem:
In the errata menu item it is used 'Applicable'
Looking into a Content View errata tab the wording is 'Affected Content Hosts'

For me there is no difference as both return 0 when the errata is installed.

Please use consistent naming.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Justin Sherrill 2017-01-03 18:12:03 UTC 
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17911 from this bug
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2017-01-04 03:18:15 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17911 has been resolved.
Comment 4 Brad Buckingham 2017-08-24 01:29:24 UTC 
Verified with Satellite 6.3 SNAP 12: satellite-6.3.0-16.0.beta.el7sat.noarch, tfm-rubygem-katello-3.4.4-1.el7sat.noarch

Both the errata and content views page now use the 'applicable' terminology.  Attaching a screenshot from the content view version to illustrate the change.
Comment 5 Brad Buckingham 2017-08-24 01:30:12 UTC 
Created attachment 1317347 [details]
Satellite 6.3 - content view version - errata
Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2018-02-21 16:39:38 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336
Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2018-02-21 16:41:34 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336
Comment 8 Satellite Program 2018-02-21 16:51:07 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.
> 
> For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.
> 
> If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336