Bug 1394529

Summary:	Contrail lifecycle issues from os-net-config overwriting contrail nic config files on subsequent deploy/update
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Guil Barros <gbarros>
Component:	openstack-puppet-modules	Assignee:	Guil Barros <gbarros>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Arik Chernetsky <achernet>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	9.0 (Mitaka)	CC:	achernet, aschultz, emacchi, gbarros, jguiditt, jslagle, morazi, srevivo
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	OtherQA, Triaged, ZStream
Target Release:	9.0 (Mitaka)	Flags:	jguiditt: needinfo? (gbarros)
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1394528	Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-11-02 22:02:05 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:	1394528
Bug Blocks:	1364146

Description Guil Barros 2016-11-13 02:52:06 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1394528 +++

Description of problem:
os-net-config runs on each create/update and overwrites contrail nic configurations.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openstack-puppet-modules-7.1.4-1.el7ost

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.deploy osp + contrail
2.do a lifecycle update that causes puppet to run on compute nodes
3.

Actual results:
contrail nic changes are overwritten

Expected results:
Contrail re-provisions its required nic setup during puppet runs

Additional info:
Patch here - https://github.com/redhat-cip/puppet-contrail/pull/20

Comment 2 Jason Guiditta 2017-03-03 15:36:22 UTC

This appears to perhaps just be a port of BZ #1418941.  Guil, can you clear up the relationship of this BZ to that one (and in turn, the one that I just referenced on the above BZ, which appears to have the same commit)? If it is just a port, upstream should simply pull the fix in, and we can the get it into OSP 9 (opm)

Comment 3 Emilien Macchi 2017-11-02 22:02:05 UTC

No activity since more than 6 months, closing this bug, feel free to re-open.