Bug 1394665

Summary:	Subpackages need to depend on newer base package
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Dominik Perpeet <dperpeet>
Component:	cockpit	Assignee:	Dominik Perpeet <dperpeet>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Jan Ščotka <jscotka>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.3	CC:	jscotka, stefw
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Extras
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-06 17:44:32 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Dominik Perpeet 2016-11-14 07:51:19 UTC

Description of problem:
Since the CSS changes, we now want to use patternfly.css
instead of cockpit.css. These changes were first distributed
in version 122 of Cockpit.

So bump the required version of Cockpit in all the manifest.json
files and RPM spec file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
122-1

How reproducible:
Always

Actual results:
Subpackages depend on older versions, e.g. 0.114 and 119

Expected results:
Dependency should be on 122

Additional info:
Fixes merged upstream with d567ebe6f6d97902f3911063671c2917d1313027 and 5746fb78f934a2b0079fc9f1d6811a34e698993d

Comment 1 Dominik Perpeet 2016-11-14 08:38:54 UTC

Upstream master commits:
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/commit/85261713fc21468664116b651ee5f6b10794bcf7
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/commit/9b3c18e6f7d631decb964ae9e12e978079905f32

Comment 2 Stef Walter 2016-11-14 08:57:54 UTC

This fixes 122 packaging before its release. It's so that this package is cleanly upgradable.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-06 17:44:32 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2888.html