Bug 1394785

Summary: Review Request: lua-bitop - Lua Bit Operations Module
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andreas Schneider <asn>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: asn, fszymanski, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jhrozek: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-28 16:26:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1394789    

Description Andreas Schneider 2016-11-14 13:05:01 UTC 
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop-1.0.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Lua Bit Operations Module
Fedora Account System Username: asn

This is required by neovim
Comment 1 Andreas Schneider 2016-11-15 10:21:32 UTC 
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop-1.0.2-2.fc24.src.rpm

Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16461221
Comment 2 Andreas Schneider 2016-11-15 12:05:25 UTC 
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop-1.0.2-3.fc24.src.rpm
Comment 3 Andreas Schneider 2016-11-15 12:11:22 UTC 
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop-1.0.2-4.fc24.src.rpm
Comment 4 Jakub Hrozek 2016-11-23 15:33:02 UTC 
It looks like this package already exists in Fedora:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/lua-bitop/

I would suggest to ask the maintainer why it's marked as Obsolete..

Other than that, your package looks good and I would have approved it. Maybe we can resurrect the old lua-bitop and you can become its maintainer?
Comment 5 Andreas Schneider 2016-11-25 09:02:57 UTC 
I requested to resurrect the package.

Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-bitop/lua-bitop-1.0.2-5.fc24.src.rpm
Comment 6 Jakub Hrozek 2016-11-25 10:16:03 UTC 
Thank you, approved.
Comment 7 Andreas Schneider 2016-11-28 16:26:46 UTC 
Not needed. luajit provides the same functionallity as builtin.