Bug 1395648

Summary: ganesha-ha.conf --status should validate if the VIPs are assigned to right nodes
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Component: common-haAssignee: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: aloganat, amukherj, asrivast, bugs, jthottan, kkeithle, mzywusko, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, skoduri, storage-qa-internal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.10.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1395539
: 1395649 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-24 11:59:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1395539    
Bug Blocks: 1364410, 1393966, 1394815, 1395649, 1395652    

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2016-11-18 18:13:45 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15882 (common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy) posted (#1) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2016-11-21 15:26:51 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15882 (common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy) posted (#2) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 3 Worker Ant 2016-11-28 14:16:00 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15882 (common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy) posted (#3) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 4 Worker Ant 2016-11-29 15:08:21 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15882 (common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy) posted (#4) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 5 Worker Ant 2016-11-29 15:19:02 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15882 (common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy) posted (#5) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 6 Worker Ant 2016-11-30 15:19:53 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15882 (common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy) posted (#6) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 7 Worker Ant 2016-12-01 11:45:28 UTC
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15882 committed in master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle) 
------
commit 5bc501fde8d8d81ed4bd12edc306bc2c6fa268e4
Author: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Date:   Fri Nov 18 13:07:50 2016 -0500

    common-ha: add cluster HA status to --status output for gdeploy
    
    gdeploy desires a one-liner "health" assessment.
    
    If all the VIP and port block/unblock RAs are located on their
    prefered nodes and 'Started', then the cluster is deemed to be
    good (healthy).
    
    N.B. status originally only checked the "online" nodes obtained
    from `pcs status` but we really want to consider all the configured
    nodes, whether they are online or not.
    
    Also one `pcs status` is enough.
    
    Change-Id: Id0e0380b6982e23763edeb0488843b5363e370b8
    BUG: 1395648
    Signed-off-by: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15882
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Arthy Loganathan <aloganat>
    Reviewed-by: soumya k <skoduri>

Comment 8 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2017-01-24 11:59:40 UTC
bug is no longer relevant after 3.9 (3.10 branch) fix is in release-3.9

Comment 9 Shyamsundar 2017-03-06 17:34:44 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.10.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-February/030119.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/