Bug 1395864

Summary: Update rhn-client-tools to python3
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component: ClientAssignee: Tomáš Kašpárek <tkasparek>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 580CC: adujicek, dyordano, galtukho, ipuertofreire, jhutar, lau18, mmraka, ngalvin, pstudeni, tkasparek, tlestach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1259884 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-21 12:06:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1259884    
Bug Blocks: 1259426, 1286555, 1397178    

Comment 1 Tomas Lestach 2016-11-21 15:54:31 UTC 
JanH, why should we test/support rhn-client-tools for python3 for Satellite 5? What is the use case?
Comment 2 Jan Hutař 2016-11-21 21:06:27 UTC 
(In reply to Tomas Lestach from comment #1)
> JanH, why should we test/support rhn-client-tools for python3 for Satellite
> 5? What is the use case?

I admit that in the bunch of cloned BZs there are some useless ones. That is why I have includede that foreword that mentions that.

In this case though, I would like us to test RHN Tools against Sat 560+570+580 on RHEL 5+6+7 because once we have compose, I assume it will be based on current Spacewalk codebase and there were lots of python3 related changes at lots of places.

So, this bug serves as a reminder for us (it is ON_QA) about that.