| Summary: | Update rhn-client-tools to python3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Jan Hutař <jhutar> |
| Component: | Client | Assignee: | Tomáš Kašpárek <tkasparek> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Jan Hutař <jhutar> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 580 | CC: | adujicek, dyordano, galtukho, ipuertofreire, jhutar, lau18, mmraka, ngalvin, pstudeni, tkasparek, tlestach |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1259884 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-21 12:06:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 1259884 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1259426, 1286555, 1397178 | ||
|
Comment 1
Tomas Lestach
2016-11-21 15:54:31 UTC
(In reply to Tomas Lestach from comment #1) > JanH, why should we test/support rhn-client-tools for python3 for Satellite > 5? What is the use case? I admit that in the bunch of cloned BZs there are some useless ones. That is why I have includede that foreword that mentions that. In this case though, I would like us to test RHN Tools against Sat 560+570+580 on RHEL 5+6+7 because once we have compose, I assume it will be based on current Spacewalk codebase and there were lots of python3 related changes at lots of places. So, this bug serves as a reminder for us (it is ON_QA) about that. |