Bug 1396004

Summary: RFE: An administrator friendly way to determine rebalance completion time
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha>
Component: distributeAssignee: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: amukherj, asrivast, bkunal, bugs, dkanemat, mpillai, rhs-bugs, storage-qa-internal, tdesala, tsugano
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.11.0 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1380598
: 1415915 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-30 18:37:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1380598, 1415915, 1436681    

Description Nithya Balachandran 2016-11-17 08:36:29 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1380598 +++

Description of problem: There is no single command with which an administrator can measure the time to complete rebalance.

Expectation: Enhance "gluster vol vol-name rebalance status" command output to display the approximate time to complete rebalance.

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2016-11-17 08:41:50 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15864 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#1) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2016-11-17 08:51:07 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15864 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#2) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 3 Worker Ant 2016-11-21 09:52:04 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#1) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 4 Worker Ant 2016-12-29 10:26:07 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#2) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 5 Worker Ant 2017-01-17 04:10:56 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#3) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 6 Worker Ant 2017-01-17 08:45:41 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#4) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 7 Worker Ant 2017-01-17 10:14:59 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#5) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 8 Worker Ant 2017-01-17 10:43:17 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#6) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 9 Worker Ant 2017-01-19 06:09:55 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15893 (dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance) posted (#7) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 10 Worker Ant 2017-01-20 04:01:51 UTC
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15893 committed in master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) 
------
commit 2edd75ec8de17da89004859375844f60890a4df0
Author: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
Date:   Tue Jan 17 15:43:47 2017 +0530

    dht/rebalance Estimate time to complete rebalance
    
    The estimates will be logged to the rebalance log on running
    gluster v rebalance <vol> status
    
    Change-Id: I9d51b139cd4c8dfde1ff2c2050720ae606c13fc6
    BUG: 1396004
    Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15893
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>

Comment 11 Shyamsundar 2017-05-30 18:37:22 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.11.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.11.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-May/000073.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/