Bug 1396319

Summary:	cant update due to file conflict on /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tre.mo
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Przemek Klosowski <przemek>
Component:	tre	Assignee:	Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	25	CC:	dominik, itamar
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-11-18 10:10:34 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Przemek Klosowski 2016-11-18 01:09:49 UTC

Description of problem:
cant update to F25 because tre blocks due to file conflict on /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tre.mo
A simple workaround of 'dnf erase tre' is unattractive due to large number of dependencies (R, Tk, texinfo, texlive..)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tre-0.8.0-17.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc25.x86_64 
tre-common-0.8.0-18.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc24.noarch

How reproducible: very

Steps to Reproduce:
1. fedup --releasever 25

Actual results:
Error: Transaction check error:
  file /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tre.mo from install of tre-0.8.0-17.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc25.x86_64 conflicts with file from package tre-common-0.8.0-18.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc24.noarch
  file /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/tre.mo from install of tre-0.8.0-17.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc25.x86_64 conflicts with file from package tre-common-0.8.0-18.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc24.noarch

Expected results: succesful update

Comment 1 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2016-11-18 10:10:34 UTC

tre-0.8.0-18.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc25 is in updates-testing and will be included as a 0day update. I can't do anything about F25 GA, sorry.

I'm curious about the large number of dependencies that you mention. Except R, I have all the others installed on my F24 machine, and I don't have tre installed at all.

Comment 2 Przemek Klosowski 2016-11-18 14:16:56 UTC

Since I wanted to update to F25, I tried

dnf erase tre-common

which resulted in deleting the following set of packages:
 R R-core R-core-devel R-devel R-java R-java-devel libRmath
 libRmath-devel libXft-devel pcre-devel qpdf tcl-devel texinfo-tex
 texlive-epsf texlive-inconsolata tk-devel tre tre-common tre-devel
 xz-devel

after which the update to F25 proceeds.
In F25 it's possible to reinstall those packages without conflict (except tre-common which doesn't exist in F25---I assume it was factored out)

Comment 3 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2016-11-18 17:15:17 UTC

(In reply to Przemek Klosowski from comment #2)
> Since I wanted to update to F25, I tried
> 
> dnf erase tre-common
> 
> which resulted in deleting the following set of packages:
>  R R-core R-core-devel R-devel R-java R-java-devel libRmath
>  libRmath-devel libXft-devel pcre-devel qpdf tcl-devel texinfo-tex
>  texlive-epsf texlive-inconsolata tk-devel tre tre-common tre-devel
>  xz-devel
> 
> after which the update to F25 proceeds.
> In F25 it's possible to reinstall those packages without conflict (except
> tre-common which doesn't exist in F25---I assume it was factored out)

Actually, a better work-around is to downgrade tre to tre-0.8.0-17.20140228gitc2f5d13.fc24 before upgrading to f25. tre-common will appear in f25 as soon as it hits stable (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0a952a3bc0).