Bug 139687 (IT#53147)
| Summary: | Satellite Server does not show valid dependencies for packages. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Steve Conklin <sconklin> |
| Component: | Server | Assignee: | Shannon Hughes <shughes> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Max Spevack <mspevack> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | bretm, rhn-bugs, tao |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-04-08 16:33:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 145821 | ||
Duplicated in RHN Sat 3.4 as well. This is an artifact of how the web site displays dependencies. They are actually correct in the database. Assigning to bretm then. Customer Facing Yes --> No. moving to 370 added estimates Shannon, could you please convey these estimates to me? TEST PLAN, follow the original private comment from Steve. Also, you may want to test a few other packages. Ran through the tests using laus-libs-0.1-66RHEL3 and verified that the requires/provides/obsoletes output from rpm matches the information within the RHN site. mass move: PROD_READY --> CLOSED:CURRENTRELEASE |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20040924 Description of problem: From IT#53147: Following these links on the Satellite Server, to look at a particular package: Channels --> <Select a Channel> --> Packages --> <Select a Package> "laus-libs-0.1-65RHEL3" --> Dependencies The results are: ************************************************************ Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) liblaus.so.1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames)-3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix)-4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies)-3.0.3-1 Provides: laus-libs-0.1-65RHEL3 liblaus.so.1 liblaussrv.so.0 pam_laus.so Obsoletes: laus-0.1-65RHEL3 ************************************************************ When I look at the actual dependencies on the package using the rpm command, I see the following: ============================================== Package Provides: ============================================== liblaus.so.1 liblaussrv.so.0 pam_laus.so laus-libs = 0.1-65RHEL3 ============================================== Package Requires: ============================================== libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) liblaus.so.1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 ============================================== Package Obsoletes: ============================================== laus < 0.1-65RHEL3 ============================================== The results on the Satellite Server does not correctly display the version information about the dependencies. Specifically, the SatServ shows that this package obsoletes a package that it requires, instead of it actually obsoleting all older versions of that package. It appears that the Sat Serv is not showing the "REQUIREFLAGS", "PROVIDEFLAGS", or "OBSOLETEFLAGS" tag values from the rpm package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Follow steps in description 2. 3. Actual Results: dependencies are not correctly displayed. Expected Results: dependencies should be correctly displayed. Additional info: