Bug 1396956

Summary: Failure to upgrade 1.3->2.0 with different rgw_region_root_pool
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Orit Wasserman <owasserm>
Component: RGWAssignee: Orit Wasserman <owasserm>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Erin Donnelly <edonnell>
Priority: high    
Version: 2.0CC: akaris, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, edonnell, flucifre, gmeno, hklein, hnallurv, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, mhackett, nlevine, owasserm, rhartman, smanjara, sweil, uboppana, vimishra, vumrao, yehuda
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 2.3   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.7-2.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.7-3redhat1xenial Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.ceph-radosgw starts as expected after upgrading from 1.3 to 2 when a non-default value is used for rgw_region_root_pool and rgw_zone_root_pool Previously, the `ceph-radosgw` service did not start after upgrading the Ceph Object Gateway from 1.3 to 2, when the Gateway used non-default values for the `rgw_region_root_pool` and `rgw_zone_root_pool` parameters. This bug has been fixed and the `ceph-radosgw` now starts as expected.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1343189 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-19 13:27:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1412948, 1437916    
Attachments:
Description Flags
1396956 none

Comment 2 Orit Wasserman 2016-11-21 09:38:55 UTC 
upstream fix: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12076
Comment 3 Orit Wasserman 2016-11-21 13:59:18 UTC 
If the rgw_region_root_pool and rgw_zone_root_pool are the same, we have a simple workaround:
The user need to add rgw_zonegroup_root_pool (rgw zonegroup root pool) to his configuration with the same value as rgw_region_root_pool.
Comment 4 Orit Wasserman 2016-12-02 14:55:22 UTC 
For the workaround:
The user should also set rgw_realm_root_pool and rgw_period_root_pool.
Comment 5 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-01-03 21:58:37 UTC 
Orit, would you please check Loic's backport to jewel upstream and approve it
if it properly fixes this issue?
Comment 6 Orit Wasserman 2017-01-04 19:19:13 UTC 
(In reply to Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) from comment #5)
> Orit, would you please check Loic's backport to jewel upstream and approve it
> if it properly fixes this issue?

The backport looks good but it still needs an additional config change for succefull upgrade. I added a known issue
Comment 57 Vidushi Mishra 2017-05-23 09:26:47 UTC 
Created attachment 1281409 [details]
1396956
Comment 60 John Poelstra 2017-05-24 15:17:42 UTC 
discussed at program meeting, development believes what QE is seeing is not a bug.  Harish believe credentials to this machine are the "usual".  will investigate today.
Comment 65 errata-xmlrpc 2017-06-19 13:27:40 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1497