| Summary: | [RFE] Display VLans with Virt Infra networking and make VLans taggable | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Loic Avenel <lavenel> | ||||||
| Component: | UI - OPS | Assignee: | Harpreet Kataria <hkataria> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Kedar Kulkarni <kkulkarn> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||||
| Version: | 5.7.0 | CC: | gblomqui, hkataria, jfrey, jhardy, lavenel, mpovolny, mshriver, obarenbo, rspagnol | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | FutureFeature, RFE | ||||||
| Target Release: | 5.11.z | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | sdn:tag | ||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2020-01-14 19:12:34 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | Feature | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | CFME Core | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Loic Avenel
2016-11-23 07:49:34 UTC
Created attachment 1226504 [details]
Infra/Networking with standard switches/lans
When adding the UI for VDS we didn't add standard VM Network LANs because the logic for displaying them is quite different. If using the same logic VDS you would see at least one additional vSwitch per host and each VM Network under that, where in the vSphere client it combines all VM Networks with the same name and doesn't show the vSwitch. I'll upload screenshots of what this would look like if we showed standard switches and LANs compared to what vSphere displays. Created attachment 1226505 [details]
vSphere Client with standard switches/lans
I think it would be confusing to show the standard switches/lans without trying to match how the vSphere client mangles^Wmassages the inventory objects. We have all the data from the provider so to display it the same way as vSphere would be a UI enhancement, and since you're combining multiple network objects into one display item I'm not sure how tagging would work. I updated the summary to reflect what seems to match the "ask" (and changed to an RFE). It sounds like (based on Adam's comment #3 and comment #5) MIQ would need a new page to show VLans apart from Distributed Virtual Switches (DVS). Intermingling them sounds like it makes it overly complicated for implementation *and* for the user ... a double whammy! My suggestion is to either pull in UX help here, or just create a new page for VLans. Leaving this on Web UI for now... |