Bug 1397755 (CVE-2016-9535)
Summary: | CVE-2016-9535 libtiff: Predictor heap-buffer-overflow | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Adam Mariš <amaris> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | erik-fedora, kabbott, mhradile, nforro, phracek, slawomir |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-02-01 10:19:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1397781, 1397782, 1397783, 1412078, 1412079, 1412080, 1412081 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1389235 |
Description
Adam Mariš
2016-11-23 10:14:48 UTC
Created libtiff tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1397781] Created mingw-libtiff tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1397782] Affects: epel-7 [bug 1397783] Hi Adam, is the link correct? https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-9535 mentions the two commits: https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/3ca657a8793dd011bf869695d72ad31c779c3cc1 https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/6a984bf7905c6621281588431f384e79d11a2e33 (In reply to Miroslav Hradílek from comment #5) > Hi Adam, > > is the link correct? > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-9535 mentions the > two commits: > https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/ > 3ca657a8793dd011bf869695d72ad31c779c3cc1 > https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/ > 6a984bf7905c6621281588431f384e79d11a2e33 The above links are correct, the ones mentioned in comment #0 seem to be wrong. This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Via RHSA-2017:0225 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0225.html |