Bug 1397809
| Summary: | rubygem-puma: FTBFS for openssl-devel 1.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jun Aruga <jaruga> |
| Component: | rubygem-puma | Assignee: | Jun Aruga <jaruga> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jaruga, vondruch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rubygem-puma-3.6.0-4.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-23 14:08:50 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
This is definitely good to solve from the long time perspective, but should this be problem right at this moment, you can use "BuildRequires: compat-openssl10-devel" instead "BuildRequires: openssl-devel", which BTW is good idea as long as Ruby itself is built against OpenSSL 1.0, i.e. as long as we stick with Ruby 2.3. (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > This is definitely good to solve from the long time perspective, but should > this be problem right at this moment, you can use "BuildRequires: > compat-openssl10-devel" instead "BuildRequires: openssl-devel", which BTW is > good idea as long as Ruby itself is built against OpenSSL 1.0, i.e. as long > as we stick with Ruby 2.3. Thanks for the good information. Okay I will use it at the moment. |
Description of problem: Build failure with openssl-1.1.x. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rubygem-puma-3.6.0-3.fc26 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 rubygem-puma-3.6.0-3.fc26.src.rpm Actual results: build.log ``` mini_ssl.c: In function 'get_dh1024': mini_ssl.c:90:5: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'DH {aka struct dh_st}' dh->p = BN_bin2bn(dh1024_p, sizeof(dh1024_p), NULL); ^~ mini_ssl.c: In function 'engine_init_client': mini_ssl.c:197:3: warning: 'DTLSv1_method' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] conn->ctx = SSL_CTX_new(DTLSv1_method()); ^~~~ In file included from /usr/include/openssl/opensslconf.h:42:0, from /usr/include/openssl/ct.h:13, from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:61, from mini_ssl.c:15: /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:1619:1: note: declared here DEPRECATEDIN_1_1_0(__owur const SSL_METHOD *DTLSv1_method(void)) /* DTLSv1.0 */ ^ make: *** [Makefile:240: mini_ssl.o] Error 1 ERROR: Error installing puma-3.6.0.gem: ``` Expected results: Build success Additional info: - That happened when openssl-devel changed from 1.0.2j to 1.1.0b. ``` openssl-devel 1:1.0.2j-1.fc26 > 1:1.1.0b-1.fc26 `` - It is reported on upstream. https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/1136