Bug 1397815

Summary: Please create rhino branch(es) for epel
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Paulo Andrade <pandrade>
Component: rhinoAssignee: Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, ebaron, mlinden
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-19 14:08:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1396565    

Description Paulo Andrade 2016-11-23 12:04:06 UTC 
Not exactly following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL

Nashorn is overall a better option than rhino, but for some
special cases it can be too much slower, e.g. when there is
significant use of eval expressions.

The reason of this request is a test case where nashorn is
roughly 20 times slower and consumes 10 times more memory.

EPEL7 branch should be enough.
Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2016-12-06 08:16:44 UTC 
Are you going to maintain the epel branch?
Comment 2 Alexander Kurtakov 2016-12-19 14:08:24 UTC 
Closing as wontfix. If one wants to take ownership of epel branches please reopen and request in pkgdb I don't have time for it.