Bug 1397846
| Summary: | [Compound FOPS]: seeing lot of brick log errors saying matching lock not found for unlock | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Nag Pavan Chilakam <nchilaka> |
| Component: | replicate | Assignee: | Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Nag Pavan Chilakam <nchilaka> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rhgs-3.2 | CC: | amukherj, kdhananj, rhs-bugs, storage-qa-internal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | RHGS 3.2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.8.4-6 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-03-23 06:21:24 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1351528 | ||
|
Description
Nag Pavan Chilakam
2016-11-23 12:57:50 UTC
Patch https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/91332 fixes this bug and is merged now. Moving this bug to MODIFIED state. hit this while validating RFE 1360978 - [RFE]Reducing number of network round trips (In reply to Krutika Dhananjay from comment #4) > Patch https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/91332 fixes this bug and is > merged now. Moving this bug to MODIFIED state. Just wanted to clear one thing - when a brick is brought down and then brought back online (irrespective of whether compound-fops is enabled or not on the volume), the 'matching lock not found' failure log messages will be seen. And the appearance of these log messages is valid in that case. However, if all replicas are up and still during IO these logs appear on the brick logs (which is what you observed), only then it is a bug. -Krutika I am not seeing these errors anymore on 3.8.4-8 with the same steps. hence moving to verified Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0486.html |