Bug 1398193

Summary: [Async] Include a KS article link under erasure coding section
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Component: doc-Administration_GuideAssignee: Laura Bailey <lbailey>
doc-Administration_Guide sub component: 3.1 Release QA Contact: storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE Docs Contact:
Severity: unspecified    
Priority: unspecified CC: asriram, asrivast, lbailey, mpillai, nchilaka, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, storage-doc
Version: rhgs-3.1Keywords: ZStream
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: RHGS 3.1.3 Async   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-26 13:00:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Anjana Suparna Sriram 2016-11-24 09:43:49 UTC
Additional information: Alok requested via email that we need to include KB article [https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2610101] under erasure coding section in the admin guide and publish the guide async.

Comment 2 Laura Bailey 2016-11-24 13:24:31 UTC
As discussed earlier today, most of the information in the bug is already in the document as part of normal performance tuning.

performance.client-io-threads is being added to the document as part of the RHGS 3.2 release, as it was unsupported for a time

client.event-threads is documented in the tuning section of the Administration Guide, although it recommends 3 threads rather than 4 - is this change significant enough to add specifically to the dispersed, distributed-dispersed sections? Should we update to recommend 4 threads generally?

Likewise, cluster.lookup-optimize is mentioned as a general recommendation for small file workloads, so nothing to change here.



Alok, Anjana, what are your thoughts here?

Comment 9 Nag Pavan Chilakam 2016-12-05 13:40:07 UTC
Hi Laura/Anjana,
I don't see any changes or mention of the KS article under Erasure coding section.
Point me the link if I missed out

Comment 12 Nag Pavan Chilakam 2016-12-06 10:12:04 UTC
looks good to me.
However the default of client.event-threads remains to be 2 but we are recommending user to set to 4 for better perf

Comment 13 Nag Pavan Chilakam 2016-12-06 10:13:24 UTC
And as discussed on mail, there is no KS link being provided in the doc, but we are making sure all the options mentioned in the KS doc is available in the admin doc