Bug 1398512

Summary:	RHEL/RHV-H 7.3 as host OS and RHEL 7.3 as RHV-M OS compatibility w.r.t. RHV 4.0
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Sarvesh Pandit <sapandit>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	rhev-docs <rhev-docs>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	rhev-docs <rhev-docs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.0.0	CC:	gklein, lbopf, lsurette, rbalakri, srevivo, thildred, ykaul
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-11-29 11:53:25 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Docs	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Sarvesh Pandit 2016-11-25 04:10:22 UTC

Description of problem:

Is 7.3 compatible with RHV 4.0? if yes then following documentation need to be updated:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-virtualization/4.0/single/installation-guide/#Host_Compatibility_Matrix

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.6/html/Installation_Guide/Host_Compatibility_Matrix.html

I have not yet seen any RHV-H version 7.3. If it is in process then needs to be mentioned in docs.

As per following link, RHV-M OS should be RHEL 7.0 but I think it has to be RHEL 7.0 or later

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-virtualization/4.0/single/installation-guide/#Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization_Manager_Requirements

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Virtualization 4.0 

How reproducible:
NA

Steps to Reproduce:
NA

Actual results:
Doc does not mention about host and RHV-M OS as 7.3 compatibility

Expected results:
As per latest supportability/compatibility of RHEL/RHV-H 7.3 docs need to be updated.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Lucy Bopf 2016-11-29 11:53:25 UTC

Thanks for reporting, Sarvesh. We're already tracking this in bug 1397237, so I'm closing this one as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1397237 ***