Bug 1399585

Summary:	python-genshi: Missing "python2-<module>" provides
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Charalampos Stratakis <cstratak>
Component:	python-genshi	Assignee:	Felix Schwarz <fschwarz>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fschwarz, jeff
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-26 19:26:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Charalampos Stratakis 2016-11-29 10:44:09 UTC

This package does not provide "python2-<module>".

As per Python packaging guidelines [0],the package must provide:
"python2-foo" for Python 2
"python-foo" for the system default Python (currently 2, but this might
change in the future)

Please use the %python_provide macro [1] to specify the correct provides.

It's fine to do this in Rawhide only.


If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance with this
issue, you can ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here.
We'll be happy to help!


[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#The_.25python_provide_macro

Comment 1 Felix Schwarz 2016-12-25 23:54:53 UTC

started https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=829322

Comment 2 Felix Schwarz 2016-12-26 19:26:40 UTC

Build successful so I think this should be fixed.

As I had only little Fedora time in the recent past I'd be glad if someone could verify that my changes bring the python-genshi package back into compliance with the python2/python3 changes ( http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-genshi.git/commit/?id=dfc36a4f0a64396860d4c53a14fe8e8858dd0f35 ).

Comment 3 Charalampos Stratakis 2017-01-02 10:30:45 UTC

Hi Felix,

Yes the package seems to have the proper provides now.

Thanks for addressing that.