Bug 1399591

Summary:	"Ignore if not exists" to be displayed in Rule Details
Product:	[Community] Bugzilla	Reporter:	Romana Cadova <rcadova>
Component:	Internal Tools	Assignee:	Matt Tyson 🤬 <mtyson>
Internal Tools sub component:	Rules Engine	QA Contact:	tools-bugs <tools-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	Docs Contact:
Severity:	unspecified
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	huiwang, lsmid, mtyson, qgong, yijli
Version:	4.4
Target Milestone:	4.4
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-01-30 01:00:49 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Romana Cadova 2016-11-29 10:57:41 UTC

When creating/editing a rule in BRE, in step 3 there is a possibility to check "ignore if not exists" field.

However, when displaying the Rule Details, this is not visible.

Would it be possible to display also this field in Rule Details too?

Example here:
https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=ruleengine/details/index.html&rule_name=unapprove

Thank you!

Comment 1 Rony Gong 🔥 2016-12-20 09:28:16 UTC

Tested on QA environment(5.0.3-rh19)
Result: Pass
Steps:
1.It show as:
Change the 'rhel-7.1.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.2.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.z' flag to '?' if it is currently '+'
Change the 'rhel-rawhide' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'exception' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'blocker' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'fast' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)

Comment 2 Rony Gong 🔥 2017-01-09 09:51:35 UTC

Tested on QA environment(4.4.12065-1.el6)
Result: Pass
Steps:
1.It show as:
Change the 'rhel-7.1.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.2.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.z' flag to '?' if it is currently '+'
Change the 'rhel-rawhide' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'exception' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'blocker' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'fast' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)

Comment 3 Matt Tyson 🤬 2017-01-30 01:00:49 UTC

This change is now live. If there are any issues, do not reopen this bug.                                                                                                           
Instead, you should create a new bug and reference this bug.