Bug 1399644

Summary: openjdk8 on windows is using manually entered ID for updates. This must be generated during build
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: jiri vanek <jvanek>
Component: java-1.8.0-openjdkAssignee: Alex Kashchenko <akashche>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.4CC: akashche, dbhole, jvanek, qe-baseos-apps
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Windows   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1399231 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-14 15:29:43 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1399231    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 Deepak Bhole 2016-11-29 18:52:52 UTC
What is the purpose of this clone?

Comment 2 jiri vanek 2016-11-30 10:05:11 UTC
Currently the id is entered manually during each build. this bug is tracking when the id will be generated.

Comment 4 Deepak Bhole 2016-11-30 15:23:45 UTC
Why is it a clone though, shouldn't it be a "blocked by 1399231" bug, or am I missing something?

Comment 5 jiri vanek 2016-12-01 10:52:45 UTC
(In reply to Deepak Bhole from comment #4)
> Why is it a clone though, shouldn't it be a "blocked by 1399231" bug, or am
> I missing something?

Sorry. It seemed to me similar enough to use clone. Next time I will just CopPaste relvant lines and manually set blocked by/depends on

Comment 6 Deepak Bhole 2016-12-01 16:54:21 UTC
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Deepak Bhole from comment #4)
> > Why is it a clone though, shouldn't it be a "blocked by 1399231" bug, or am
> > I missing something?
> 
> Sorry. It seemed to me similar enough to use clone. Next time I will just
> CopPaste relvant lines and manually set blocked by/depends on

Ah okay, thanks! Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing any context.

Comment 9 jiri vanek 2016-12-12 08:25:36 UTC
This is now covered in checker testsuite.