| Summary: | HAProxy scaling guidelines. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Vladislav Walek <vwalek> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Jiří Mencák <jmencak> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, bperkins, jeder, jokerman, mmccomas, tstclair, vwalek, wmeng |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | aos-scalability-34 | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-17 12:38:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Vladislav Walek
2016-11-30 10:19:55 UTC
@Vladislav - There exists some data, but your initial question is vague, and your example is quite specific. So I'm slightly confused by what you are looking for? Could you please elaborate in more detail your specific request. xref: https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/install/planning.html Hi Vladislav, As Tim said, haproxy scaling and performance tuning is in scope and underway. Because it's a large area of research, we're taking a phased approach; making incremental progress with every minor release of OCP. Jiri should reply soon to answer your last question about how many connections haproxy can handle in OCP. The specific use-case for amqp and 400k connections I think is unfortunately outside of our current scope and ability to test. That said, we will be continuing to push haproxy further and further as time goes on, and document architectural best-practices and tuning that is identified. Hello Jeremy, thank you for reply. Customer is closing the attach case, so you can close the ticket. Thank you |