Bug 1400231

Summary:	compat-openssl10-devel Conflicts: openssl-devel
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Component:	compat-openssl10	Assignee:	Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	tmraz
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-01 11:22:12 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1400196, 1400233

Description Rex Dieter 2016-11-30 17:32:00 UTC

I know compat-openssl10-devel mentions:

# The devel subpackage intentionally conflicts with main openssl-devel
# as simultaneous use of both openssl package cannot be encouraged.
# Making the packages non-conflicting would also require further
# changes in the dependent packages.
Conflicts: openssl-devel


kde-sig currently have (almost) our entire software stack of blocking on this currently.

Qt5 is (hopefully) fixed as of today, but much legacy software (including Qt4) still FTBFS against openssl-1.1.  Couple this with a few -devel items in the software stack that currently:
Requires: openssl-devel
(like mariadb-devel), and we have a much bigger FTBFS problem


Now, if this legacy compat package cannot or will not move headers, then maybe the newer openssl-1.1 one can and should.

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2016-11-30 17:37:45 UTC

See also related mariadb bug #1400233

Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2016-12-01 11:22:12 UTC

I am sorry, but no, I am not going to move the openssl-1.1 headers and promote the use of compat-openssl10.

Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2016-12-01 14:26:03 UTC

I'm sorry too, I didn't have to expect to raise this to FESCo

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2016-12-01 14:27:02 UTC

Unless, do you have some other reasonable compromise for fixing all the not-yet-ported-to-openssl-1.1 packages?

Comment 5 Tomas Mraz 2016-12-01 15:00:06 UTC

Can you please come up with a list of the packages where the conflicts prevents them from rebuilding?

Comment 6 Tomas Mraz 2016-12-01 15:06:48 UTC

Also btw - without full namespacing of the API symbols in includes the -devel packages really conflict and just moving the files around does not really fix this conflict. Yes, in practice it might sometimes work but there is no guarantee.

Comment 7 Rex Dieter 2016-12-01 15:28:16 UTC

Currently the list includes only what
BuildRequires: mariadb-devel
(which includes qt and everything that depends on it), but that appears to be close to being resolved via bug #1400233