| Summary: | Offline upgrade to F25 failed (packagekitd crashed); no visible feedback | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Will Thompson <will> | ||||
| Component: | PackageKit | Assignee: | Richard Hughes <rhughes> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | jonathan, klember, rdieter, rhughes, smparrish | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-08 19:23:49 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '24'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 24 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-08-08. Fedora 24 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |
Created attachment 1227251 [details] journal from the boot where the offline upgrade failed. Description of problem: I attempted an upgrade from F24 to F25 using GNOME Software. On reboot, I saw the “upgrading system; this may take a while” message and the Fedora logo progress indicator began to move, then stopped. On logging in on another VT, I discovered that packagekitd had aborted: PackageKit[1031]: upgrade-system transaction /4699_adbeeaeb from uid 0 finished with failed after 1190ms pk-offline-update[1011]: status finished packagekitd[1031]: *** Error in `/usr/libexec/packagekitd': corrupted double-linked list (not small): 0x00007fb78817bdf0 *** audit[1031]: ANOM_ABEND auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:rpm_t:s0 pid=1031 comm="packagekitd" exe="/usr/libexec/packagekitd" sig=6 packagekitd[1031]: ======= Backtrace: ========= packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7566b)[0x7fb7ad25266b] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7b844)[0x7fb7ad258844] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7e615)[0x7fb7ad25b615] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libc.so.6(cfree+0x4c)[0x7fb7ad25e36c] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/librepo.so.0(lr_yum_repo_free+0x3a)[0x7fb79da4be0a] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/librepo.so.0(lr_result_clear+0x23)[0x7fb79da4a533] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/librepo.so.0(lr_result_free+0xe)[0x7fb79da4a55e] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libhif.so.1(+0x11d18)[0x7fb79e343d18] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_unref+0x1a7)[0x7fb7adcf4117] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_ptr_array_foreach+0x3b)[0x7fb7ad9f007b] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x1e110)[0x7fb7ad9f0110] packagekitd[1031]: /usr/lib64/packagekit-backend/libpk_backend_hif.so(pk_backend_stop_job+0x54)[0x7fb79f5f95c4] packagekitd[1031]: /usr/libexec/packagekitd(+0x130d8)[0x55fe7485d0d8] packagekitd[1031]: /usr/libexec/packagekitd(+0x1ce46)[0x55fe74866e46] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_dispatch+0x15a)[0x7fb7ada1b6ba] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x49a70)[0x7fb7ada1ba70] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0xc2)[0x7fb7ada1bd92] packagekitd[1031]: /usr/libexec/packagekitd(main+0x4e9)[0x55fe74858239] packagekitd[1031]: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1)[0x7fb7ad1fd731] packagekitd[1031]: /usr/libexec/packagekitd(_start+0x29)[0x55fe748583e9] (Full log attached.) There was no user-facing indication that this had happened (beyond no progress being shown). If I didn't know how to VT switch and check what was going on, I would probably have left it for a while and then hard power-cycled the computer. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): PackageKit-1.1.3-2.fc24.x86_64 How reproducible: Only happened once. When the system came back up, I ran `dnf update` in the hope of getting an updated PackageKit (nope) and tried another system upgrade from GNOME Software. This "upgrade" completed very quickly and did not, in fact, upgrade my system – I am still running F24. Unfortunately I don't have a core file.