| Summary: | RFE: test './manage.py rawhide_to_release' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Internal] Red Hat Internal Copr | Reporter: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup> |
| Component: | frontend | Assignee: | Copr Team <copr-team> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | msuchy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1400941 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2020-12-14 10:59:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Pavel Raiskup
2016-12-02 11:19:41 UTC
`./manage.py rawhide_to_release` might get replaced by forking on chroots as forking does keep db up-to-date and has potential to also keep dist-git branches up-to-date with the state of backend repos. This is something we might want. Even if forking is used, it still might be ./manage.py command but it won't be probably tested on level of ./manage.py even in that case. I don't think testing manage.py commands is strictly required even though quite easily possible with our integration test suite. |