| Summary: | seamonkey require system-bookmarks which do not exists in Fedora 24 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Zamir SUN <sztsian> |
| Component: | seamonkey | Assignee: | Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | caillon+fedoraproject, dmitry, extras-qa, gecko-bugs-nobody, jhorak, kengert |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1361851 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2016-12-15 17:22:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 1361851 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Zamir SUN
2016-12-04 02:07:41 UTC
Looks strange a bit... All the releases have the package "fedora-bookmarks" (ie., fedora-bookmarks-25-1.fc25.noarch.rpm), and all such packages provide "system-bookmarks". Maybe something goes wrong with yum/dnf upgrade process? IOW at the upgrade time "fedora-bookmarks" package are seen, but the fact that it provides also "system-bookmarks" is ignored for some reason... Well, sorry for this, but it is strange to me now as well. I upgraded my working machine (newly installed by the very beginning of Fedora 24 release) and during upgrade this did not happen. However, the two machines at home, both upgraded from Fedora 23 (or even earlier) to Fedora 24 and now Fedora 25, have this issue (both meet the bug 1361851 before). I'm now lower the priority and severity as it seems still not clear for both of us. After struggling for several days, I finally figured out the cause. There is happened to be astronomy-bookmarks-1-16.fc25.noarch which also provided fedora-bookmarks, and marks fedora-bookmarks package as conflick Error: package astronomy-bookmarks-1-16.fc25.noarch conflicts with fedora-bookmarks provided by fedora-bookmarks-25-1.fc25.noarch so fedora-bookmarks is not installed! However I never know why the package astronomy-bookmarks is there in my system! Shall we change the bug to astronomy-bookmarks instead? It was some similar conflicts before, when astronomy-bookmarks provided system-bookmarks. Since the name is beginning with "a", it took precedence over "f" (fedora-bookmarks). IOW when something required "system-bookmarks", the "astronomy-bookmarks" was installed instead. Probably it is a reason why you have this package installed. More recent astronomy-bookmarks packages drop system-bookmarks providing. So you have package which no more provides system-bookmarks, but prevents installing of a package (fedora-bookmarks) which still provide it. The solution seems to remove astronomy-bookmarks before update/upgrade anyway. |