| Summary: | bluez package should either bluez-obexd or bluez-obexd should be split to separate rpm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | David Jaša <djasa> |
| Component: | bluez | Assignee: | David Arcari <darcari> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ken Benoit <kbenoit> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.2 | CC: | darcari, jshortt, tpelka |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-01 23:14:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1353018 | ||
|
Description
David Jaša
2016-12-05 12:50:22 UTC
Hi, Yes, the original thought was to not add the additional package and break an end-users setup. My concern is if I separate the package as you request, the customer will do an 'yum update bluez' and lose the ability to do an 'obex' file transfer unless they manually run 'yum install bluez-obexd'. Not a good idea. I can add a dependency on bluez to also install bluez-obexd, but that would make things different from Fedora. Though the Fedora soultion isn't ideal as everyone complains about it. So I am thinkig of splitting the package out and adding a dependency, which should fix your problem? Meanwhile I will have to figure out the Fedora situation and perhaps backport that to RHEL. Thoughts? Cheers, Don Ah, good suggestion. I think so. Should be easy to implement and test. Do you have a particular package that has this explicit Requires that I can verify with? Cheers, Don (In reply to Don Zickus from comment #3) > Ah, good suggestion. I think so. Should be easy to implement and test. > > Do you have a particular package that has this explicit Requires that I can > verify with? > > Cheers, > Don rebuild of Fedora's gnome-user-share (which needs mod_dnssd), both rebuilt using mock (mock --rebuild mod_dnssd.src.rpm ; mock --clean ; mock -i mod_dnssd.rpm ; mock --no-clean --rebuild gnome-user-share.src.rpm) Tested on a system with RHEL-7.4-20170410.n.3 installed. # yum provides bluez-obexd Loaded plugins: product-id, search-disabled-repos, subscription-manager This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register. bluez-5.44-2.el7.x86_64 : Bluetooth utilities Repo : beaker-Workstation Matched from: Provides : bluez-obexd Marking as verified. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2209 |