Bug 1402022

Summary: bodhi mails and subject lines -> strip them to a sane lenght
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Harald Reindl <h.reindl>
Component: bodhiAssignee: Luke Macken <lewk>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: lewk, randy
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-06 18:43:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
it's ridiculous
none
insane none

Description Harald Reindl 2016-12-06 15:19:20 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 1 Randy Barlow 2016-12-06 18:43:40 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1366325 ***

Comment 2 Harald Reindl 2016-12-06 18:59:27 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 3 Randy Barlow 2016-12-06 23:36:10 UTC
Hello Harald!

Perhaps I misunderstand the meanings of the resolution states, but I intended for Closed --> Upstream to mean that I will track the issue with the upstream issue tracker rather than here on Bugzilla. In this case, that would be the GitHub issue that I marked as the "External Bug ID":

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/882

I generally prefer to use BZ to track packaging related issues for Bodhi (including existing patches from upstream that need to be backported as spec file patches), and I use GitHub to track issues with the code itself. I don't mind at all when people file issues here since bug reporting is a valuable contribution - I usually just refile them at GitHub and mark them Closed --> Upstream and mark the external bug id.

I hope that helps, and let me know if you have a suggestion about how I could use Bugzilla to make that clearer in the future.

Comment 4 Harald Reindl 2016-12-07 07:51:51 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 5 Randy Barlow 2016-12-08 19:53:54 UTC
Hi Harald,

I've actually just today written a patch to stop it from writing the "This update has reached the stable karma threshold and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes" e-mails repeatedly!

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1145

We just need to get that reviewed, merged, released, and deployed. There are a few other fixes I need to release as well, so it might take a few more days.

Comment 6 Harald Reindl 2016-12-08 19:55:53 UTC
thank you!

Comment 7 Harald Reindl 2017-04-08 16:10:08 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 8 Harald Reindl 2017-04-08 16:12:37 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 9 Randy Barlow 2017-04-09 15:10:18 UTC
Nobody works full time on Bodhi, and there are quite a few high priority items that take the little bit of time that is spent on Bodhi.

Pull requests are welcome!

Comment 10 Harald Reindl 2017-04-09 15:36:55 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)