|Summary:||fence-rhevm has to move to v4 API of RHV (v3 will be deprecated)|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7||Reporter:||Yaniv Kaul <ykaul>|
|Component:||fence-agents||Assignee:||Oyvind Albrigtsen <oalbrigt>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||cluster-qe <cluster-qe>|
|Version:||7.3||CC:||aherr, cfeist, cluster-maint, dfediuck, mjuricek, mperina, mtessun, omachace, pelauter, rduda, sbradley|
|Target Milestone:||rc||Keywords:||FutureFeature, ZStream|
|Fixed In Version:||fence-agents-4.2.1-18.el7||Doc Type:||If docs needed, set a value|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|:||1708547 1709780 1710801 1710802 (view as bug list)||Environment:|
|Last Closed:||2019-08-06 12:34:23 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||1708547, 1709780, 1710801, 1710802|
Description Yaniv Kaul 2016-12-08 13:39:35 UTC
Description of problem: RHV is going to be deprecated v3 API in a year. v4 API is already available from 4.0 (Aug 2016) - the agent should move to the new API. Personally, I'd create fence-rhvm4 agent.
Comment 2 Marek Grac 2016-12-12 11:33:55 UTC
@Yaniv: Would it be possible to have API that will last (almost) forever? I have no issues with building fence_rhevm4 but it will be harder to add a new packages to RHEL7 in next years.
Comment 3 Yaniv Kaul 2016-12-20 14:08:44 UTC
(In reply to Marek Grac from comment #2) > @Yaniv: > > Would it be possible to have API that will last (almost) forever? I have no > issues with building fence_rhevm4 but it will be harder to add a new > packages to RHEL7 in next years. For the lifecycle of RHV 4.x, the v4 API will be supported. That's several years.
Comment 4 Marek Grac 2017-02-06 09:09:11 UTC
*** Bug 1402860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Oyvind Albrigtsen 2017-02-24 13:49:51 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #3) Will it be backwards compatible with v3 as mentioned in the following bz? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422499#c0
Comment 6 Yaniv Kaul 2017-03-06 12:21:26 UTC
(In reply to Oyvind Albrigtsen from comment #5) > (In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #3) > Will it be backwards compatible with v3 as mentioned in the following bz? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422499#c0 No, v4 is completely different.
Comment 8 Oyvind Albrigtsen 2017-11-01 14:43:51 UTC
Bumping to 7.6.
Comment 17 Oyvind Albrigtsen 2019-05-09 13:31:15 UTC
Comment 25 errata-xmlrpc 2019-08-06 12:34:23 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2037