Bug 1403953
| Summary: | Browsing for iso file on disk doesn't show files | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paweł <pawel.wierzbicki.pl> | ||||
| Component: | qgnomeplatform | Assignee: | Jan Grulich <jgrulich> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | jgrulich, mbriza, rcyriac | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-09-06 13:43:00 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Paweł
2016-12-12 17:13:55 UTC
Hello, which desktop environment (GNOME, etc.) are you using, please? Do you get the native file dialog or something different? FMW definitely does give the hints but they probably get lost along the way when creating the dialog. If you're in GNOME, please also tell me if you have the qgnomeplatform package installed. Created attachment 1231337 [details]
PrintScreen of "open file" dialog
PrintScreen of the dialog window.
Hi, I wanted to make it in one comment, but attachment made a single comment, so sorry about that. I'm using default Fedora 25, so it's GNOME. I get the native file dialog, see attachment. It looks, like I have this package installed. [pawiecki@e320pw ~]$ rpm -qa | grep qgnomeplatform qgnomeplatform-0.2-10.20161024git.fc25.x86_64 Now I can see iso files srtaight away, with no problem, so I guess it's fixed, and we can close the bug report? :) I guess so. Thanks for checking up on this. :) |