Bug 1403972

Summary:	[RFE] Integration with ResultsDB
Product:	[Community] rpm-test-trigger	Reporter:	Jon Orris <jorris>
Component:	general	Assignee:	beaker-dev-list
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	unreleased	CC:	jhutar, jorris
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:	1371750
Bug Blocks:	652429, 1351482

Description Jon Orris 2016-12-12 19:02:36 UTC

Description of problem:

In the short term we are reporting results as Errata comments; see Bug 1403657

In the longer term, we will need to send rpmdeplint test results to ResultsDB in order to integrate with the Factory 2.0 workflow. 

http://threebean.org/blog/all-hail-resultsdb/

Comment 2 Jan Hutař 2017-08-09 11:09:34 UTC

ResultsDB v1.0 allows PASSED, INFO, FAILED, ERROR, WAIVED, NEEDS_INSPECTION, v2.0 only allows PASSED, FAILED, INFO, NEEDS_INSPECTION but it is possible to add "note" and any number of "key=values" to the result. I assume we will stick to v2.0.

Comment 4 Dan Callaghan 2017-08-10 04:22:13 UTC

(In reply to Jan Hutař from comment #3)

Might be off-topic for this bz, but I would suggest *not* to embed the name "rpm-test-trigger" in the test case name stored in ResultsDB. After all, rpm-test-trigger is just the thing *triggering* the test, it has nothing to do with the test that is actually being executed (which is really rpmdeplint and its various checks).

You might reasonably imagine a future (not so distant) where someone insists that the tests be triggered in Jenkins instead of a standalone daemon. At which point rpm-test-trigger would not be needed.

Comment 5 Jan Hutař 2017-08-10 06:53:26 UTC

I see. Makes perfect sense.

Comment 6 Jon Orris 2018-06-07 19:27:02 UTC

Removing needinfo for myself, since I'm not involved in Beaker/rpmdeplint, and I don't know anything about future plans for ResultsDB.