Bug 1404547

Summary: [Doc]Correction about how much C&U data is collected at the first collection
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Nandini Chandra <nachandr>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.7.0CC: adahms, hhudgeon, jhardy, obarenbo, tpapaioa
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: cfme-future   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: doc:c&u
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-10 12:39:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Nandini Chandra 2016-12-14 05:18:33 UTC 
Description of problem:
-----------------------
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_CloudForms/3.2/html/Insight_Guide/chap-Capacity_Planning.html#sect-Capacity_and_Utilization_Collection

The Insight Guide states this in section 4.1.1. Assigning the Capacity and Utilization Server Roles:

The first collection from a particular provider may take a few minutes since CloudForms Management Engine is gathering data points going one month back in time.
 
CFME actually gathers data points for the current hour only. Refer to this BZ for more information:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348879


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
--------------------------------------------------------------
5.7


How reproducible:
-----------------
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:
---------------


Expected results:
-----------------


Additional info:
----------------

Document URL: 

Section Number and Name: 

Describe the issue: 

Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information:
Comment 2 Andrew Dahms 2018-10-10 12:39:05 UTC 
Thank you for raising this bug.

We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request for the documentation, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. 

If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Andrew Dahms.