Bug 140496
Summary: | Zaptel udev rules addition | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Colin Charles <byte> |
Component: | udev | Assignee: | Colin Charles <byte> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | CC: | mattdm, steve |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.4.0-2.beta1 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-10-31 15:25:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Colin Charles
2004-11-23 03:45:04 UTC
udev latest - udev-039-10.FC3.2.i386 what about the package providing /etc/udev/rules.d/51-zaptel.rules ?? is there a zaptel s.th. module? Fair enough Harald. When it does get inclusion into Extras, we'll make sure we provide /etc/udev/rules.d/51-zaptel.rules In the meantime, we'll just keep this open so that we can track what needs to be done _if_ we include Asterisk into Core I'm happy for the bug to be reassigned to me, if need be - I'm on the Extras bug as well. Thanks Fedora Core 3 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC5 updates or in the FC6 test release, reopen and change the version to match. Thank you! So, when zaptel was added into Extras the udev rules were provided in that package. This bug presumably got overlooked. Closing. |