Bug 140900
Summary: | system-config-printer does not install a ppd from file correctly | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Walter Mueller <walter.mueller> |
Component: | system-config-printer | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-29 16:14:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Walter Mueller
2004-11-26 07:59:31 UTC
Are you looking under "Kyocera Mita", which is what the PPD sets Manufacturer to? Why do the XML file names bother you? They are not user-visible. There is no entry for "Kyocera Mita" The XML file names are printed on ther terminal, so i can see them. If i install PPD files for different printers the ppd-ppd1-*, ppd-ppd2-*, ... naming scheme is confusing You probably have to restart system-config-printer after importing the PPD (this is fixed in rawhide). I don't see your point with the XML file names at all. How do they confuse you? You never have to choose between different XML file names. I did restart system-config-printer after importing the PPD but nothing changed. It is fixed in rawhide. After i rebuilt system-config-printer-0.6.117-1.src.rpm from rawhide and installed /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/system-config-printer-0.6.117-1.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/system-config-printer-gui-0.6.117-1.i386.rpm i can see Kyocer Mita in the printer manufacturer menu and select and use the correct printer driver. My point with the XML file names is the aversion of a long time systemadministrator against obscure naming scheme when it would be easy to use descriptive names. I had to install and delete the ppd files to test this case. I also experimented with different languages of this driver. I always had to open the file to see which PPD it belonged to. If you install the same driver twice then next /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/opt/ppd-ppd* is created, the existing is not used. I missed a choice to delete a wronly installed PPD Avoiding overwrites is intentional -- you might want to have two different PPDs alongside one another, but for the same model. Anyway, glad this is fixed in rawhide. Thanks for testing. |