Bug 1409148

Summary: Are we using liveusb-creator or Fedora Media Writer?
Product: [Retired] Fedora Documentation Reporter: Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk>
Component: install-guideAssignee: Jaromir Hradilek <jhradile>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Docs QA <docs-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: develCC: bugzilla, pbokoc, zach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-20 01:01:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Patrick Uiterwijk 2016-12-29 22:30:59 UTC
In Fedora 25 Install guide (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/Installation_Guide/sect-preparing-boot-media.html):

On Fedora 24 or later, you can download Fedora Image Writer with the command:
$ sudo dnf install liveusb-creator
You can call Fedora Media Writer by issuing the command:
$ sudo liveusb-creator

While Media Writer provides liveusb-creator, we might want to provide "dnf install mediawriter".
However, that is just a small annoyance, the big painpoint is with "sudo liveusb-creator", which is NOT a binary provided by mediawriter.
Which means one has to manually figure out they are supposed to run "sudo mediawriter".

Also, do we really want to suggest this method of starting and running?
First off, I think GNOME software might have it listed, so mentioning that as the primary method might be more user-friendly?

Second, please do not teach people to just randomly slap "sudo" in front of commands. As far as I know, mediawriter can be started as normal user perfectly fine, and it'll ask for permissions as soon as they are needed.