Bug 1409403

Summary:	Does not recognize 'ber' locale
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Björn 'besser82' Esser <besser82>
Component:	iso-codes	Assignee:	Parag Nemade <pnemade>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	39	CC:	caillon+fedoraproject, i18n-bugs, j, kevin, mfabian, pnemade, twoerner
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	i18n
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Björn 'besser82' Esser 2017-01-01 19:20:46 UTC

Description of problem:

  Rpmlint does not recognize 'ber' locale.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  rpmlint-1.9-6.fc26


How reproducible:

  100%


Steps to Reproduce:

  1.  Run rpmlint on a package providing 'ber'-locale.


Actual results:

  E: invalid-lc-messages-dir /usr/share/locale/ber/LC_MESSAGES/


Expected results:

  Should be recognized as valid locale, since filesystem-package ships this.


Additional info:

  'ber' is a valid ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-5 language code.
  See:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes#B

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2017-01-02 08:46:04 UTC

rpmlint's list of valid locale names is generated from the files shipped by (upstream) iso-codes, so problems with the data in it should be reported and fixed there.

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2017-02-28 10:51:55 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle.
Changing version to '26'.

Comment 3 Mike FABIAN 2017-12-06 07:27:04 UTC

Seems to still exist in Fedora 27.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2019-02-19 17:12:20 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 30 development cycle.
Changing version to '30.

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:27:09 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2023-04-03 09:45:31 UTC

This looks fixed to me already, even in RHEL 9 (which has iso-codes-4.6.0).

⬢ 9$ rpm -q iso-codes -l | xargs grep ber 2>/dev/null | grep Berber
/usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_15924.json:      "name": "Tifinagh (Berber)",
/usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_639-2.json:      "name": "Berber languages"
/usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_639-3.json:      "name": "Judeo-Berber",
/usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_639-5.json:      "name": "Berber languages"
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_15924.xml:		name="Tifinagh (Berber)" />
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639-2.xml:		name="Berber languages" />
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639-3.xml:		reference_name="Judeo-Berber"
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639-3.xml:		name="Judeo-Berber" />
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639-5.xml:		name="Berber languages" />
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639.xml:		name="Berber languages" />
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639_3.xml:		reference_name="Judeo-Berber"
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639_3.xml:		name="Judeo-Berber" />
/usr/share/xml/iso-codes/iso_639_5.xml:		name="Berber languages" />

Comment 7 Parag Nemade 2023-04-03 10:12:26 UTC

I think you misunderstood this bug.
iso-codes need to provide /usr/share/locale/ber/LC_MESSAGES/ 
which is still not there. Hence, bug is not fixed.

Comment 8 Jens Petersen 2023-04-04 07:19:48 UTC

Ah I see

Is there an upstream report?

Comment 9 Parag Nemade 2023-04-04 07:44:16 UTC

Someone need to report it.
I am having trouble with login issues at Debian Salsa Gitlab.

Comment 10 Fedora Release Engineering 2023-08-16 07:04:03 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle.
Changing version to 39.