Bug 1410100

Summary:	Package arequal-checksum for broader community use
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Shyamsundar <srangana>
Component:	packaging	Assignee:	bugs <bugs>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	mainline	CC:	bugs, ndevos, sarumuga
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	EasyFix, StudentProject, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-03-12 14:49:47 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Shyamsundar 2017-01-04 13:05:37 UTC

In the gluster community meeting there was a discussion around how we should package arequal-checksum.c for use in our internal tests.

The core of the discussion was, we should package this as a tool, so that a much wider audience could use it, than host a built version in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nigelbabu/arequal/

This bug is being raised to request this packaging.

1) Ensure arequal-checksum.c (in, tests/utils) in our gluster repository is the same as the one in github, https://github.com/raghavendrabhat/arequal (or decide which is the one we want)

2) Build and package this in some devel or test RPM so that test machines or other distros can later leverage the same tool.

Comment 1 Shyamsundar 2017-01-04 13:11:25 UTC

Meeting minutes here for reference: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2017-01-04/gluster_community_meeting_20170104.2017-01-04-12.00.log.html

Comment 2 Niels de Vos 2017-01-04 13:24:50 UTC

I guess we'll move arequal-checksum.c from tests/utils/ to extras/ and install it by default and package it in glusterfs-devel. This would allow source installations to have it immediately, and developers or users that want to run tests can install it when needed.

Kaleb, this acceptable to you too?

Comment 3 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2017-01-05 10:28:32 UTC

I don't have any objection to it.

Comment 4 Worker Ant 2019-08-18 12:04:33 UTC

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23252 ([WIP]Package arequal-checksum for broader community use) posted (#1) for review on master by Rishubh Jain

Comment 6 Worker Ant 2020-03-12 14:49:47 UTC

This bug is moved to https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/1073, and will be tracked there from now on. Visit GitHub issues URL for further details