Bug 1410735
| Summary: | dynflow_executor memory increase triggered by capsule sync | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Pavel Moravec <pmoravec> |
| Component: | Tasks Plugin | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.2.5 | CC: | bbuckingham, inecas, pmoravec |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | ||
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-10 09:49:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Pavel Moravec
2017-01-06 09:42:06 UTC
There were some bugs fixed in 6.2.6 that potentially might influence this behaviour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391704, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398438 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399294 They all have been fixed in 6.2.6. Could you test this with 6.2.6. Also, I think this comment applies here as well https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362168#c20. I the small-growths, that might be just caused by the inefficiencies of Ruby memmory defragrmentation, we don't have much possibilities other than setting the top limit where we preffer restart the process to start from scratch. (In reply to Ivan Necas from comment #1) > There were some bugs fixed in 6.2.6 that potentially might influence this > behaviour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391704, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398438 and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399294 > > They all have been fixed in 6.2.6. Could you test this with 6.2.6. Longer test with 6.2.6, memory stabilized after many hours/capsule synces on some fairly low value. Therefore this is fixed in 6.2.6, thanks! Closing this BZ as resolved by: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:2958 |