Bug 141087

Summary: gconfd crashes whenever launching a program that uses it
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Elliott Kipp <edk4971>
Component: GConf2Assignee: Mark McLoughlin <markmc>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3CC: ariel, barryn
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-12-14 17:56:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Elliott Kipp 2004-11-29 06:36:56 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.3; Linux) (KHTML, like Gecko)

Description of problem:
From /var/log/messages

Nov 29 00:42:01 testlaptop gconfd (neo-3071): starting (version 2.8.1), pid 3071 user 'neo'
Nov 29 00:42:01 testlaptop gconfd (neo-3071): Received signal 11, dumping core. Please report a GConf bug.

happens regardless of who invokes the process (neo or root)
seen in evolution and mozilla so far, Konqueror seems to work fine

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.8.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run mozilla or evolution
2. stare at blank screen while nothing happens....
3. vi /var/log/messages
    

Actual Results:  Absolutely nothing

Expected Results:  My application should have started.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Elliott Kipp 2004-11-29 07:05:39 UTC
Downloaded/compiled/installed version 2.8.0.1 and now it works fine... 

Comment 2 Barry K. Nathan 2004-11-29 07:31:06 UTC
Hmmm... just a wild guess, but I wonder if this is another
manifestation of bug 141087. (If it is, then there's a new prelink
package in updates/testing which should keep the problem from
reoccurring.)

Comment 3 Barry K. Nathan 2004-11-29 07:31:55 UTC
Oops, *this* is 141087! I meant bug 140081.

Comment 4 Mark McLoughlin 2004-12-14 17:56:31 UTC
That its a prelink issues is as good a guess as we can make without a
stack trace of the crash, I guess. Closing, please re-open if you see
this again.

Comment 5 Mark McLoughlin 2004-12-14 18:00:41 UTC
*** Bug 136984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***