Bug 1411311
Summary: | [RFE] Integrate Tap as a Service (TaaS) into RHOSP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Bertrand <brault> |
Component: | openstack-neutron | Assignee: | OSP Team <rhos-maint> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Toni Freger <tfreger> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | adakopou, akaris, brault, broose, chrisw, cmuresan, cory.bannister, cylopez, dhill, dhruv, fduthill, jmelvin, kpeeples, lmiccini, maford, rhos-maint, rnoriega, shtiwari, srevivo, ssigwald, tvvcox |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | Flags: | jmelvin:
needinfo?
(rhos-maint) dhruv: needinfo? (rhos-maint) |
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | https://launchpad.net/tap-as-a-service | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Feature Request | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1409964 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1667921, 1848015, 1411434, 1476900 |
Description
Bertrand
2017-01-09 12:35:48 UTC
Thanks for filing this request. Please note that this is not part of our immediate plans and is not scoped for RHOSP 11 or 12. Please keep this BZ up to date with more details on the use-case. Thanks, Nir Bertrand, I'd like to use this RFE as a tracker to collect requirements for TaaS. Can you please check with the Nokia team if they are OK with making it a public BZ? Thanks, Nir (In reply to Nir Yechiel from comment #2) > Bertrand, > > I'd like to use this RFE as a tracker to collect requirements for TaaS. Can > you please check with the Nokia team if they are OK with making it a public > BZ? > > Thanks, > Nir Hello Nir, Sorry for the late reply. Nokia is perfectly fine in having that BZ public. Sincerely, Bertrand (In reply to Bertrand from comment #3) > (In reply to Nir Yechiel from comment #2) > > Bertrand, > > > > I'd like to use this RFE as a tracker to collect requirements for TaaS. Can > > you please check with the Nokia team if they are OK with making it a public > > BZ? > > > > Thanks, > > Nir > > Hello Nir, > > Sorry for the late reply. Nokia is perfectly fine in having that BZ public. > > > Sincerely, > > Bertrand Thanks a lot. Any idea of an easy way to do it? It looks like I can't simply "clear" the partner field. Thanks, Nir (In reply to Nir Yechiel from comment #4) > (In reply to Bertrand from comment #3) > > (In reply to Nir Yechiel from comment #2) > > > Bertrand, > > > > > > I'd like to use this RFE as a tracker to collect requirements for TaaS. Can > > > you please check with the Nokia team if they are OK with making it a public > > > BZ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nir > > > > Hello Nir, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. Nokia is perfectly fine in having that BZ public. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Bertrand > > Thanks a lot. Any idea of an easy way to do it? It looks like I can't simply > "clear" the partner field. > > Thanks, > Nir Hi Nir, This BZ is already public as far as I can tell as there is no group defined for it. That said I may be missing your point. Sincerely, Bertrand *** Bug 1462796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** As per Assaf's request on the duplicate 1462796, we have a new customer requiring this in Belgacom. "I'd like to know if and when the Tap-as-a-Service project would be integrated in RedHat OSP. Feature is very important for insight inside the VNF running on our planned "Telco Cloud"." *** Bug 1571884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1881890 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi, there seems to be some interest on this. Any ETA ? Thanks, Cristian Hi, One of my customer is also looking TaaS as a feasible option to implement and to explore the possibilities "For the security probes (threat detection)". Any ETA or input to know if this has some priority in our roadmap? Thanks, Shravan |