Bug 1412117
Summary: | [RHV-RHGS]: Parallel IOs from two sub directories of VM is not working. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Byreddy <bsrirama> |
Component: | replicate | Assignee: | Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rhgs-3.2 | CC: | bsrirama, pkarampu, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, sasundar, storage-qa-internal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-02-15 10:53:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1277939 |
Description
Byreddy
2017-01-11 09:59:25 UTC
This may affect grafton too, if there are more than one applications running on the application VM and consuming the storage, it may lead to one app to starve. As discussed on Wednesday, please provide volume-profile output of the run the next time you try to recreate it, for further investigation. (In reply to Krutika Dhananjay from comment #3) > As discussed on Wednesday, please provide volume-profile output of the run > the next time you try to recreate it, for further investigation. Right now setup is busy with diff issue...i will provide the cmd output. You can easily reproduce this issue. Byreddy could hit this issue in his setup consistently, but with the same workload, I couldn't hit this issue in my setup ( QEMU/KVM RHGS setup ). The only difference being that Byreddy has RHGS machines are Virtual machines and in my setup I have RHGS machines as physical machines and volumes are mounted back on the same hypervisor We are testing it out to eliminate differences in the setups and could arrive at the real problem Need more time to investigate whether this is a real issue or a specific setup issue Sas, For 3.3.0 planning, what is your recommendation about this bug? (In reply to Pranith Kumar K from comment #8) > Sas, > For 3.3.0 planning, what is your recommendation about this bug? Pranith, As I heard last from Byreddy that this issue is no longer occurring in his setup. @Byreddy, could you please confirm ? Please close this bug, if its no longer reproducible or occurring in the setup. (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #9) > (In reply to Pranith Kumar K from comment #8) > > Sas, > > For 3.3.0 planning, what is your recommendation about this bug? > > Pranith, > > As I heard last from Byreddy that this issue is no longer occurring in his > setup. > > @Byreddy, could you please confirm ? > Please close this bug, if its no longer reproducible or occurring in the > setup. When i tried once again this issue on good configuration VMs, i didn't see this issue so closing as NOTABUG |