Bug 1414804
Summary: | systemd-tmpfiles-setup hangs during boot if /home is an auto-mounted NFS mount | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Till Hofmann <thofmann> |
Component: | systemd | Assignee: | systemd-maint |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 25 | CC: | chris, johannbg, lnykryn, mbiebl, msekleta, muadda, ssahani, s, systemd-maint, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-12-12 10:50:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Till Hofmann
2017-01-19 13:59:59 UTC
The issue does not appear when /home is a local automount. In that case, automount is triggered by systemd-tmpfile: home.automount: Got automount request for /home, triggered by 961 (systemd-tmpfile) Looking at system-tmpfiles-setup's service file, I can see that it contains the ordering dependency "After=local-fs.target", but nothing similar for remote fs. Is there an ordering dependency missing? I had the same problem with a remote nfs /home mount. According to the tmpfiles.d manpage, you can put a symlink to /dev/null in /etc/tmpfiles.d/ to override the corresponding config file in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/ . Here's an excerpt from the tmpfiles.d manpage : "If the administrator wants to disable a configuration file supplied by the vendor, the recommended way is to place a symlink to /dev/null in /etc/tmpfiles.d/ bearing the same filename." So i did this : ln -s /dev/null /etc/tmpfiles.d/home I consider this a temporary solution, e.g. workaround. Your suggestion considering the ordering dependencies seems like something to look into. See upstream bug report https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1959 This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '25'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |